The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Quad LNB to Single Digibox ?




HTEG> I'm having some problems with my Sky reception and need some
advice.
HTEG> Reception through the Winter months was ok, not brilliant, but
good
HTEG> enough reception on the channels I wanted to view. Now, as a
neighbour's
HTEG> tree has filled out with leaves, the reception is very poor,
bordering
HTEG> on unwatchable. I'm getting frequent digibox lock-ups and the
signal
HTEG> disappears completely in any sort of rain.

HTEG> I can trim the offending tree up to a point, but as it's a
neighbours, I
HTEG> can only go so far and I suspect I'll need to do more to get a
proper
HTEG> result. I'm looking at a bigger dish, but as an alternative can I
HTEG> connect a single digibox via splitters to a twin or quad LNB i.e.
HTEG> multiple LNB outputs to a single digibox ?

HTEG> I know multiple digiboxes to a single LNB is a bad idea, but what
about
HTEG> the other way around ?

This won't work. The attenuation of the splitters will exceed any
potential gain of adding feeds together; the attenuation of the
splitters will almost certainly stop the control signals from the
digibox controlling the LNB properly, and you're exceedingly unlikely
to get the phasing of the signals to add. At best you're signal will
be worse than before and at worst the digibox won't work at all.

I would check the dish alignment first, then try and find a site for
the dish that is not obstructed by trees. Even with a larger dish you
are likely to have problems unless you have clear line of sight to the
satellite.

Bill




UKHA_D Main Index | UKHA_D Thread Index | UKHA_D Home | Archives Home

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.