Re: RE: Good news for Non BB users, Ip Telephony

["Frank Mc Alinden" <armagh@xxxxxxx>]

Hi Andy
Are you saying its not very good when using a dialup modem
??

or does the lite service help improve the quality ?

Frank


----- Original Message -----
From: "UKHA" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Saturday, March 15, 2003 12:21 AM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RE: Good news for Non BB users, Ip Telephony


>
> Your brother would need to  use the lite service with lower bit rate
> codecs.
>
> I have done some tests with Graham Howe and 'out of the box' the
> quality is poor due to the bandwidth required.
>
> This is basically why I posted the original message, it appears that
FWD
are
> working to accomodate ISDN and dialup (56k) users
>
> Have a look at
>
> http://lite.fwdnet.net
>
> Andy
>
>
> On 14/03/2003 at 12:38 Nikola Kasic wrote:
>
> >My brother doesn't have broadband, but ISDN.
> >Can I talk to him, if he uses software instead of IP phone?
> >I will probably use software too, because IP phones are very
expensive.
> >If that works, I'll jump into this train.
> >Nik
> >
>
>
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>