RE: A Little OT: Server Security

["Rob Mouser" <rmouser@xxxxxxx>]

Do we not need a security certificate from a provider such as verisign?
The documentation on their website seems to indicate that a certificate
is the only way to ensure browser security.

Or am I just barking up the wrong lamppost?

Many thanks

Rob Mouser




-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Bond [mailto:chris@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 18 June 2003 15:29
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] A Little OT: Server Security

Forgot to say run the microsoft lockdown tools and security analyser -
that
will help along with windows update.  By far you need to keep ontop of
critial updates with windows boxes on a day to day basis.

Kind Regards,
Chris Bond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Rob Mouser" <rmouser@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 3:18 PM
Subject: [ukha_d] A Little OT: Server Security


> Here at work we are developing an on-line ordering system which will
> link directly to our SQL server (We are populating our own web server
at
> present.). Can anyone point me in the direction of a good source of
> information (Basics upwards!) on the implementation of a secure site
> (I.e. HTTPS) as we seem to have something of a hole in our knowledge
> here :-( and I don't fancy a hole in our security (Ouch!)
>
>
>
> Thanks for all your time.
>
>
>
> Many thanks
>
>
>
> Rob
>
>   _____
>
> Rob Mouser
> Director
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   _____
>
> The information contained in or attached to this email is intended
only
> for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed. If
an
> addressing or transmission error has misdirected this e-mail and you
are
> not the intended recipient, or a person responsible for delivering it
to
> the intended recipient, you are not authorised to and must not
disclose,
> copy, distribute, print or retain this message or any part of it. It
may
> contain information which is confidential and/or covered by legal
> professional or other privilege (or other rules or laws with similar
> effect in jurisdictions outside England and Wales).
>
> The views expressed in this email are not necessarily the views of
> Chamaeleo Ltd, and the company, its directors, officers or employees
> make no representation or accept any liability for its accuracy or
> completeness unless expressly stated to the contrary.
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> ** UKHA2004 BE THERE! ** - start planning now.
>
> http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>



** UKHA2004 BE THERE! ** - start planning now.

http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/