[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: CCTV cable Q
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: CCTV cable Q
- From: "Stuart Billinghurst" <stuart@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 09:21:53 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I may be wayyyy off here but, you used to be able to get baluns to put
on cat5 so that you could run coaxial networks across them.. Would
something like this work?
http://tinyurl.com/3f6x8
(Black Box)
Stuart,
-----Original Message-----
From:
sentto-1109639-88954-1072084415-stuart=billinghursts.com@xxxxxxx.
yahoo.com
[mailto:sentto-1109639-88954-1072084415-stuart=billinghursts.com@xxxxxxx
.groups.yahoo.com] On Behalf Of Mark McCall
Sent: 22 December 2003 09:14
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] CCTV cable Q
In my experience it depends on length, and where the cables run. I have
a
cam at our back door on CAT5 - it only has maybe 7 metres to run to Node
0
and the picture is fine. The camera at the front door is also CAT5 but
more
like a 20 metre run and it looks terrible. If you must use CAT5 for
long
runs then look at www.kat5.com
M.
UKHA 2004: 15th and 16th May 2004
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
_____
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|