[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: VPN Question
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: VPN Question
- From: "mark_harrison_uk2" <mph@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 09:57:02 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "John McManus" <jpm.egroup1@b...>
wrote:
> Bad form to reply to your own posts but...
John,
Eacfilt is, as I'm sure you guessed, a proprietary Nortel driver.
I'm glad it's working.
The routing tables you posted confirmed that the "office" network
(assuming that we call yours the "home" network) is, indeed,
using
192.168.0.0 addresses. I also see they're using 10.0.0.0 in there.
It may be worth reconfiguring you home LAN to use the address range
172.20.0.0 instead of 192.168.0.0. This should mean that you no
longer have the potential for addressing conflicts (and is a
legitimate thing to do.)
Regards,
Mark
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|