The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: Re: Hangin' Fuji


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [OT?] Speed Trap help


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [OT?] Speed Trap help
  • From: "Hawes,Timothy Edward (GEG)" <haweste@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2003 15:25:05 -0000
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerard McGovern Sent: 04 December 2003 15:18
>
> Would the money be better spent on a decent CCTV system? If
> it recorded 24
> frames per second then you could prove the speed was high by
> painting lines
> on the road and using simple mathematics. The video provided
> could then be
> more useful for a prosecution than a simple speed reading.
>
> G

We do have CCTV, which also switches to IR at night. The big problem I see
with that though is having to analyse the film continuously to determine
whether each vehicle is speeding or not. The advantage I saw of the
frame-grab method would be the analysis of "speeding/not
speeding" would have already occurred and the was only (!) the tasks
of sorting through each of the captures images and recording registration
numbers & details.

Thanks for the thoughts though :-)

Tim H.

+


Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.