Re: Re: X10 Question

["Dean Smith" <ukha@xxxxxxx>]

If we're offering firmware improvement ideas for LD11s how about... ;-)

"Instant off" and Variable ramp rates - both via Extended X10
commands

Dean

----- Original Message -----
From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 10:07 AM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: X10 Question


Maybe the next X10 product for Li - LD11 with status response (if available
patents allow?)  :-)

Paul.



-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Howe [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 19 August 2003 09:11
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: X10 Question



--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "arni_skarphedinsson" <arnis@n...>
wrote:
> Beeing new to X10 equipment I have a simple question,
>
> as X10 can not send it=B4s status over the wire, how do you handle
> situations where you have maby x10 din units to control lights, but
> also want to be able to switch them on and off with convenional
> switches, if someone witches a light off, the X10 equipment vont
> work, what is the workaround for this example ?

Sorry, I miss read a bit of your post. With Din rail modules the norm
is to use momentary switches so there is no on/off state on the
switch and therefore the x10 equipment always works. It is true that
with plug in modules someone can turn off the socket and the x10 unit
will then be inaccessible. And my rant about lack of status feedback
still stands.