The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: X10 Question


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: X10 Question
  • From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:07:22 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Maybe the next X10 product for Li - LD11 with status response (if
available=
patents allow?)  :-)

Paul.=20

=20

-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Howe [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]=20
Sent: 19 August 2003 09:11
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: X10 Question

=20

--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "arni_skarphedinsson"
<arnis@n...>=20
wrote:
> Beeing new to X10 equipment I have a simple question,
>=20
> as X10 can not send it=B4s status over the wire, how do you handle=20
> situations where you have maby x10 din units to control lights, but=20
> also want to be able to switch them on and off with convenional=20
> switches, if someone witches a light off, the X10 equipment vont=20
> work, what is the workaround for this example ?

Sorry, I miss read a bit of your post. With Din rail modules the norm=20
is to use momentary switches so there is no on/off state on the=20
switch and therefore the x10 equipment always works. It is true that=20
with plug in modules someone can turn off the socket and the x10 unit=20
will then be inaccessible. And my rant about lack of status feedback=20
still stands.







Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.