[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: X10 Question
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: X10 Question
- From: "Paul Gale" <groups@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:07:22 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Maybe the next X10 product for Li - LD11 with status response (if
available=
patents allow?) :-)
Paul.=20
=20
-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Howe [mailto:graham@xxxxxxx]=20
Sent: 19 August 2003 09:11
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: X10 Question
=20
--- In ukha_d@xxxxxxx, "arni_skarphedinsson"
<arnis@n...>=20
wrote:
> Beeing new to X10 equipment I have a simple question,
>=20
> as X10 can not send it=B4s status over the wire, how do you handle=20
> situations where you have maby x10 din units to control lights, but=20
> also want to be able to switch them on and off with convenional=20
> switches, if someone witches a light off, the X10 equipment vont=20
> work, what is the workaround for this example ?
Sorry, I miss read a bit of your post. With Din rail modules the norm=20
is to use momentary switches so there is no on/off state on the=20
switch and therefore the x10 equipment always works. It is true that=20
with plug in modules someone can turn off the socket and the x10 unit=20
will then be inaccessible. And my rant about lack of status feedback=20
still stands.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|