[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Telephone + Ethernet on 1 cable
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Telephone + Ethernet on 1 cable
- From: "Robert Welsh" <bob-ukha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:09:01 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Steve,
I just had to do something very similar.
In order to use my SLIMP3 in my lounge I needed ethernet in there.
I already had a phone socket nearby. So I used the phone cable to pull
through a Cat5 (which has 8 cores..the phone cable only had 6) as there
wasn't room in the woodwork to pull through more than one Cat5 cable.
I then used 3 cores to rewire the phone up and 4 of the remaining cores
I used for ethernet.
Works a treat.
Rob
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve Morgan [mailto:steve@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 14 April 2003 10:31
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Telephone + Ethernet on 1 cable
>
>
> I'm sure this has come up in the past, but I haven't managed to find
> anything in the archive, so I'll ask anyway...
>
> I'm a Cat5 cable short going to the living room and I'm just about
> to mod my XBox. One cable is a PABX line for the Digibox and TiVo.
> I'm using RJ45 to BT adapters at each end. Is there any reason why I
> shouldn't make up a splitter/combiner to carry Ethernet on the spare
> pairs?
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|