|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: [OT] VB.NET programmers? |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] Harry Potter DVD - Whats the deal ????
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: [OT] Harry Potter DVD - Whats the deal ????
- From: "steevc" <steevc@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 07:08:32 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
AFAIK the 16:9 is just a compromise between getting a wide picture
and being viable to manufacture CRTs. I suppose with plasma and LCD
screens they could be much wider.
It seems to be an eternal problem that people will complain if they
see black bars on their screens. I seem to remember a Watchdog
article where someone complained that a 'widescreen' DVD did not fill
his widescreen TV and then they went on about the confusing system of
different ratios.
Personally I prefer to see as much of the original picture as
possible. On our 32" it's usually big enough even in very wide
ratios. I remember watching The Abyss and thinking that it was taking
up less than half the screen. I don't like stretched pictures, so
things like Sky 1 are watched with bars at the sides. Cars do not
have oval wheels. I have been caught out by this when the TV was on
the wrong setting.
With broadcast you see very little that's wider than 16:9. Sometimes
they get your hopes up by showing the titles in full width, but
that's just to fit all the writing in.
What makes me laugh is that Cbeebies is always 16:9 even though most
of the programmes were made in 4:3. Like little kids care?
There's been a whole discussion about ratios over at www.avforums.com
which I can recommend for those who like to argue about such things.
Steve
Who doesn't get that much time to watch TV anyway
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Keith Doxey" <lists.diyha@b...>
wrote:
> I assume you are talking about "True Lies"
>
> I dont mind that. Its a 16:9 picture on my 4:3 TV and I have about
2" bars
> top and bottom on the 28" TV. Had the HP DVD been 16:9 I would
have
bought
> it but the one they are selling as Widescreen would have given at
least 4"
> bars on my TV. At least when I got round to buying a WS set the
picture I am
> currently looking at would fill the screen. The thought of buying a
new TV
> to rid myself of the black bars only to find I still get them would
be a tad
> annoying to say the least.
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|