|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: Vigor/ADSL Help |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: I'm an arrogant sod with a beemer (was Symantec - Virus Warning
Bulletin)
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: I'm an arrogant sod with a beemer (was Symantec
- Virus Warning Bulletin)
- From: "Gerard McGovern" <stuff@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 6 May 2002 12:21:48 +0100
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> I also think (maybe) that they should change the motorway
> lane rules as I often "undertake" when someone will not move
> out of the way as I regard going straight MUCH safer than
> crossing many lanes only to cross them again to get back into
> which ever lane I can use.
Sorry, but undertaking is unbelievably dangerous. Just because person A
is not obeying the rules of the road does not give person B the right
to
break the law.
I assume that the person you are undertaking is sitting in the outside
lane and going around 70 MPH? You break the law by undertaking and you
also break the law by speeding. And to cap it all off, you create the
chance of a serious accident.
Is it really worth it to gain an extra few seconds?
G
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|