[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Smoothwall
I'd agree with that, simply because it doesn't argue with what I said=20
:-)
But as yet there really is no technical difference other than a few=20
fixes.
On 10 Mar 2002 at 19:32, Chris Bond wrote:
> Behind the scenes it=92s a bit better than smoothwall, i.e. not as
many
> shell exploits if someone had shell access (which you don't really
give
> out anyway!)
--
Calum Morrell
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|