The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Average Computing Devices\Person Ratio in UKHA households


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Smoothwall



That's not true Chris. IPCop is a recent fork from Smoothwall GPL and=20
as a result is almost identical at the moment. It is however=20
*completely* free of charge and will remain so. This is not the case=20
with Smoothwall.

My advice is the same as Chris's tho. IPCop has a lot going for it,=20
not least the skills and knowledge of the main developers and the=20
features they plan to implement into IPCop for the future.

Rather than using the sourceforge site, try http://www.ipcop.org ...=20
yes I know it points to the same place, but that may not be the case=20
in future :-)

Also, if you need any help with it, point your IRC client to=20
irc.openprojects.net and /join #ipcop

On 10 Mar 2002 at 12:07, Chris Bond wrote:

> 200MB would be fine - however look at http://ipcop.sourceforge.net it=92s
> a lot more secure than smoothwall.
>=20
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Pedro de Oliveira [mailto:p.oliveira@xxxxxxx]
g to the smoothwall site it seems that it's a linux distro .
> is
> > this right?=20=20
<SNIP>
Yes

> > What I would like to know is how much disk space smoothwall
needs.
I can get cheap (=A32) 200Mb hard drives but how much space
could I get away with 200Mb??=20
<SNIP>
That should be fine


Does smoothwall do
> > internet connection sharing?  Does it do port forwarding??
<SNIP>
Yes and yes. Also supports transparent proxy, DMZ, VPN, etc etc etc

Enjoy :-)

--
Calum Morrell



  • References:
    • Smoothwall
      • From: Pedro de Oliveira <p.oliveira@xxxxxxx>
Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.