The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: A Question about X10.


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: A Question about X10.
  • From: "Kenneth Watt" <kennwatt@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 5 Jul 2002 14:55:50 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

>             Quick question for Ken
>         How do you find using the din modules ok? I was going to
replace
> my
> relay control to x10 dimmer  ld11 units but keep hearing about how
> unreliable  x10 is . Would like a hard wired solution but so
expensive. My
> little shack is quite small so i would imagine it should be ok to use
x10
> ?
>
> Frank Mc

Honestly Frank I don't know what all the fuss is about over X10
reliability I find it works 99.99% of the time no problem, bar the odd
cock up which is usually my programming that sucked and not X10! ;)

Well that's the experience with HV anyway, the CM12 experiment went a
tad south. :(

The LD11's are superb a huge improvement over the old LD10, still lacks
status response but that's about all it does lack really (note to self:
DO THE REVIEW!!)

Likewise I would use the hard wired solution too but X10, to me, offers
more flexibility at a lower cost so I went with that and, using HV, I'm
glad I did. I wouldn't anticipate any problems other than the usual X10
interference nonsense and the getting it wired stuff.

K.


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.