The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: Mercury Mail ----- HELP!!!!!!!!!!


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: RS232 or RF X10?


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: RE: RS232 or RF X10?
  • From: "Paul Gordon" <paul_gordon@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:43:36 +0000
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx


Sorry Tim, - been a bit busy today...

Personally, I really wouldn't touch an RF solution with a shitty stick.
(Well, not an X10 RF product set anyway) - I understand there are other
supposedly far more reliable systems such as the Visonic that Comfort
sell...

The X10 RF stuff, just plain ain't reliable enough in my experience. We all
know how bad the TM12's can be for locking up, plus the batteries in the
handheld remotes are guaranteed to give up just at the wrong time.

I would, if it is a feasable option, go for a wired solution every time.

Paul G.


>From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
>Reply-To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RS232 or RF X10?
>Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:16:44 -0000
>
>I CAN'T BELIEVE THAT NO-ONE ELSE HAS AN OPINION!
>
>Come on guys I'm asking for help here!
>
>Tim.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Andy Bovingdon [mailto:bov@xxxxxxx]
>Sent: 13 February 2002 11:53
>To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subject: RE: [ukha_d] RS232 or RF X10?
>
>At 11:13 AM 13-02-02 +0000, you wrote:
>
> >It does, but because the implementation of X10 is so poor in this
>country,
> >you don't get status updates if you use momentary switches.
Although
> >possible it also is difficult to execute scenes using the local
control
>
> >switches.
>
>So how can we help change this status? Is there any way we can
influence
>the manufacturers to only supply fully functional solutions in this
>limited market?
>
> >I should have said Lutron type . There are plenty of hard-wired
> >controllers that give the flexibility of X10 and some.
>
>Such as? I can feel my wallet vibrating...
>
> >What I should have asked is for experiences of those who have
>implemented
> >HA during a new-build or total re-wire as that is what I will be
doing.
>
>Mine has been a semi-total rewire - doing it in sections. Basic
>rule I'm following is to route everything back to one side of
>the house and along to one central point. That gives me the
>flexibility to change things later - I can wire pretty much
>any combination - never enough wires :)
>
>
>___________________________________________________________________
>ANDREW  BOVINGDON   Tarantella,  Vision Park   Tel: +44 7768 877170
>      Director,       Cambridge,  CB4 9ZR,  UK   Fax: +44 1223 518001
>Product Marketing      www.tarantella.com       bov@xxxxxxx
>
>
>
>For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
>Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
>Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
>Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
>List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
>Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
>http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>




_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com


For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/


Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.