The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Joining CAT5


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Joining CAT5
  • From: "Jon Whiten" <jon@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2002 17:38:29 +0100
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

Rather than a coupler (2 sockets back to back) I have used a little box that
has 16 punch-down connectors to join 2 cat5s.

I got mine from RS (http://rswww.com) - The stock code was 340-9646. but
they cost 2.97 each for 10+ !!

Regards,

Jon
http://www.whiten.co.uk/



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Rob Mouser [mailto:rmouser@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 08 August 2002 09:23
> To: Ukha (E-mail)
> Subject: [ukha_d] Joining CAT5
>
>
> After a slight shift around my Node 'O' is taking a walk 5 feet to the
> left. (Very long story, just don't ask.)
> One small problem is that I have 12 runs of CAT5 which now could do with
> being just that little bit longer! Its not the end of the world because
> I can just move the patch panel to the bottom of the rack, but it would
> be nice to leave it where it was intended to go.
> I know the 'book of Cat5 rules' states that you NEVER join Cat5 lengths
> but have noticed that couplers have started appearing (Even in
> Screwfix.).
> Is their a reliable solution?
> Can it be done?
> Has any one any experience?
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.