|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: Re: HomeDislay - cases |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hv multizone ir system Costing
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: Hv multizone ir system Costing
- From: "graham_howe" <graham@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2002 12:02:43 -0000
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Frank Mc Alinden" <armagh@b...>
wrote:
> Nik
> There are several
advantages with using stick on
emitters ...1: No chance of something phyically blocking the signal .
2: Home vision has total control of the ir system .3:Having total
control Homevision will know the status of all equipment ,ie on / off
muted etc , with a blaster system Homevision or the remote can send
signals to the receiving device therefore Statuses unknown . My first
home brew unit was a blaster type system and when working on the
current system some of the guys explained to me about the stick on
emitter system and eventually it sunk in.................
>
> Frank Mc
Yeah, this is another good point, though not so relevant for me as
the equipment will not be in the same place as the remote anyway. I
suppose that I should also point out that I may well not be using a
remote control at all in some rooms, but instead will send the 'IR
Command' to HV from a HomeAutomator web page. This is particularly
true since my Pronto finally gave up the ghost at the weekend.
Graham (surrounded by 10 remote controls and not achieving a high WAF
right now)
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|