The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024

Latest message you have seen: RE: cables. was HA system networks


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: MP3 or WMA



I would probably want to listen by album, the 2 bits of software for playing
I've tried are Windows media Player and Musicmatch Jukebox. Although I find
them ok, WMP is the only one which show album level. The Musicmatch shows
all tracks for an artist, for all albums, pity when selecting an artist it
then doesn't show their albums. Any suggestions here on either I can achieve
this using the two bits of software or recommend another?

Also do people tend to back up their files, as they get quite large, what do
people use?

Thanks

Keith

----- Original Message -----
From: "Eric de Oude" <eric.de.oude@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 7:47 AM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] MP3 or WMA


> Stuart wrote
>
>
> "Frankly I'd just find a set of tools (encoding and playing) that you
> like and use whatever format they use, unless you're likely to
> exchange files with folks who might otherwise have a
> preference... ;-)"
>
> Got to agree here big time. Most importantly for me it depends on
> where/what you are going to replay your songs on. I had a Rio 300 and a
> Rio 500 for many years - these devices would only support MP3 - So the
> choice was pretty straight forward. As I had a 64Mb Rio and 64Mb card -
> that left me with 128Mb of music for the day, so space becomes very
> important. I ripped the same song at differing bit rates and tested.
> Eventually I settled on 128Kbps.
>
> The software suite I used was dictated by how I got music onto the
> device.
>
> Nowadays music gets listened to on the iPAQ during the day and Rio
> Receiver at home. As space is still very important to me on the iPAQ, I
> have stuck to 128Kbps, but moved to WMA files as Windows Media Player
> was the easiest way to transfer files. I do think the WMA is better than
> MP3 at 128Kbps.
>
> Next thing to consider is how do you listen to music - in other words do
> you like a mixed up bunch of songs, or do you listen on a album basis.
> The software you use will have differing support for playlists etc
> between MP3 and WMA. Tag and Rename does not support WMA. Although the
> media library Management Wizard supplied with the Windows XP Media
> Player Bonus pack can be used.
>
> Loads to think about - Do some tests yourself, understand if the set of
> tools does the job for you, and then rip away.
>
> Eric
>
>
>
>
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx > Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx > Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx > List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx >
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>


Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
ADVERTISEMENT

For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe:  ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe:  ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner:  ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.

  • References:
Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.