|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
|
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: MP3 or WMA
> Rowdy wrote:
> Starting to copy my CD's to my PC, was going to store as MP3's but
a
> friend has said that WMA format is better and to copy at @
128kbps.
> Before I embark on this anyone care to comment on which format I
> should use and why.
Try doing some encoding at different bit rates and encoders and then
decode them to a CDR. and listen on your various stereos / discmans and
decide for yourself
I find MP3 at between 96 and 128 indistinguishable from each other -
they are all awful.. 160 is ok for most stuff but 192 is better. I have
on a couple of tracks heard problems at 192 that went away at 256.
I figure that HDD space is getting cheaper and cheaper and cheaper and
just do all the new stuff at 320. Its a shame that most of the stuff
you
find online is at 128 and done in a shitty shitty encoder..
Yahoo! Groups
Sponsor |
ADVERTISEMENT
|
|
|
For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|