The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: PAQ Man


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: PAQ Man
  • From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 23:37:09 +0100
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx


*chuckle* You're just saying that to make me feel better...

....Ok. Things that make the iPaq better than the rest.

1) The screen.
2) It's faster than most others.
3) The screen.
4) It fits better into my hand than the others.
5) The screen.
6) It feels well built.
7) The screen.

Right, joking aside it is the screen that makes that little sucker. It's
gloriously bright and clear - if Philips had stuck one of these screens
into
the colour Pronto I would have had *NO* reservations about buying one even
at ?700. It's usable in bright sunlight (try that with most laptops ... I
rate the screen on my VAIO but direct sunlight kills it completely) and is
clear enough to use in any light indoors.

Phil


Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian G. Reynolds [mailto:brian.g.reynolds@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 30 September 2001 23:12
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: PAQ Man
>
>
> Thanks Darren, I do not ember Phil's item, or his microdrive......
> Phil has too much kit to remember it all!
>
> They certainly are a good bit of kit.
>
> What sort of things can you do with these things that make them so
> desirable, apart from the fact that they are gorgeous.
>
> I know you can access the web, sent email, has calendar, schedule,
phone
> databases but what sets it apart from the others?
>
> B.
>



Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.