[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: IIS Worm
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: IIS Worm
- From: "Graham Howe" <graham@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 22:19:53 +0100
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I knew this was the case for Win2K but is it also the case for NT (remember
it is an NT4 server). Also if these are just the admin shares then what
should the directory permissions be (mine are showing Administrators,
SYSTEM, CREATOR OWNER as having Full Control and Server Operators and
Everyone having Change).
Graham
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Hetherington (egroups)
> [mailto:mark.egroups@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 19 September 2001 22:12
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: IIS Worm
>
>
> > Graham I was under the inpression that under WIN2k
"ALL"
> local hardrives
> > where shared by default, instead of deleting thses shares just
> > disable them,
> > see if that works, havnt used the server before but, so no actual
> > experience.
>
> Win2K can do some auto sharing of drives for administration
> purposes only.
> In this case it is not possible to turn sharing off since it
> is prohibited
> by the OS to try so I assumed that it was not shares such as
> these that
> Graham was concerned with.
>
> Mark.
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-->
> FREE COLLEGE MONEY
> CLICK HERE to search
> 600,000 scholarships!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/47cccB/4m7CAA/ySSFAA/IBOolB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------~->
>
> For more information: http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
> Post message: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subscribe: ukha_d-subscribe@xxxxxxx
> Unsubscribe: ukha_d-unsubscribe@xxxxxxx
> List owner: ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|