The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Re: IIS Worm



Are you having any luck Graham?

I'm in the same position with an NT Server system, no trace of nimda now,
but all drives are shared after every reboot.
I have found a stand alone removal tool here
http://vil.nai.com/vil/virusSummary.asp?virus_k=99209#RemovalInstructions
which is supposed to remove the shares created by the virus.

I will let you know if it works.

Justin.

----- Original Message -----
From: Graham Howe <graham@xxxxxxx>
To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, September 19, 2001 10:19 PM
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: IIS Worm


> I knew this was the case for Win2K but is it also the case for NT
(remember
> it is an NT4 server). Also if these are just the admin shares then
what
> should the directory permissions be (mine are showing Administrators,
> SYSTEM, CREATOR OWNER as having Full Control and Server Operators and
> Everyone having Change).
>
> Graham
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mark Hetherington (egroups)
> > [mailto:mark.egroups@xxxxxxx]
> > Sent: 19 September 2001 22:12
> > To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> > Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: IIS Worm
> >
> >
> > > Graham I was under the inpression that under WIN2k
"ALL"
> > local hardrives
> > > where shared by default, instead of deleting thses shares
just
> > > disable them,
> > > see if that works, havnt used the server before but, so no
actual
> > > experience.
> >
> > Win2K can do some auto sharing of drives for administration
> > purposes only.
> > In this case it is not possible to turn sharing off since it
> > is prohibited
> > by the OS to try so I assumed that it was not shares such as
> > these that
> > Graham was concerned with.
> >
> > Mark.
> >




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.