[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: First MP3 results in - Tim eats his words!
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: First MP3 results in - Tim eats his words!
- From: "Timothy Morris" <timothy.morris@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 May 2001 18:17:55 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
However he does go more than a little overboard in his myths section. If
SACD/DVD-Audio is soo bad then why in DBTs do over 70% of users prefer the
sound of SACD? In fact the DBT I'm referring to the listeners didn't even
know that they were listening to SACD, they were just told it was two
different CDs using two different mastering methods.
There is a lot of useful information that I gleaned from his site, but
after
I read the myths section, I decided to try it for myself. I CAN tell the
difference between CD and 192k mp3.
Tim.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Lee [mailto:jasonjlee@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 08 May 2001 16:07
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] First MP3 results in - Tim eats his words!
>
>
> For those of you converting to MP3, you might like this site....
>
> http://www.r3mix.net
>
> which is considered THE site when it comes to mp3 encoding
> settings and mp3
> quality testing.
>
>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|