[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: OT: Office XP -worth it?
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: OT: Office XP -worth it?
- From: "Jon Whiten" <jon@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 7 Jun 2001 00:36:27 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Yes it seems fairly stable. I can crash Outlook2K reliably by clicking on
a
URL in an HTML email message and that is about it! So far in around 6-8
weeks or so I've not had to forcibly re-boot at all.
To be honest I never got round to trying Win2K.
Regards,
Jon
+--------------Personal------------+----------Work-----------+
Jon Whiten Church Gresley D.G. Controls Limited
Derbyshire Beacon Lamp Specialists
jon@xxxxxxx England mail@xxxxxxx
http://www.whiten.co.uk/
http://www.deegee.com
+----------------------------------+-------------------------+
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Timothy Morris [mailto:timothy.morris@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 06 June 2001 21:04
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] OT: Office XP -worth it?
>
>
> Apart from that its stable?
>
> I took part in the Corporate Preview Programme for Win 2k, but the
current
> programme is only open to the US and Canada residents. With a bit of
luck
> Microsoft will send me a mailer on it before long (I'm registered
> with them
> as a systems integrator). It will make a change from the
> anti-piracy flyers
> that seem to arrive about once a month.
>
> I'll be interested to see the differences between the "Home"
and "Pro"
> versions of XP, having run NT and W2k for a good few years now, I
> think I've
> been spoiled, and the home version may be a little cut down for me.
>
> How does it compare to W2k, which in itself was a massive step up
> from NT4?
>
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|