RE: Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint

["Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>]

Who do I have to blow to get it finished?

....on second thoughts I think I'll just stick with my Pyramid IR relay and
wait!

Phil

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Keith Doxey [mailto:ukha@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 June 2001 21:10
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint
>
>
> If the idea I am working on succeeds then you wont need a second run
of
> CAT5. you will be able to upgrade the existing KAT5 units to handle
the IR
> as well.
>
> First tests look really promising.
>
> Keith
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 05 June 2001 15:20
> To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
> Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint
>
>
> I don't have co-ax.
>
> However, I could live with a second run of CAT5 if I needed to...
>
> Mark Harrison
> Head of Systems, eKingfisher
>
> ******************************************************************
> **********
> Kingfisher plc
> Registered Office: North West House, 119 Marylebone Road, London NW1
5PX
> Registered in England, Number 1664812
>
> This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed
and
> may contain confidential information.  Unless stated to the contrary,
any
> opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent
the
> official view of the company.  If you have received this e-mail in
error,
> please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this
message
> from your system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes,
or
> disclose its contents to any other person.  Thank you for your
> co-operation.
> ******************************************************************
> **********
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: patrickl@xxxxxxx [mailto:patrickl@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 5 June 2001 14:03
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: [ukha_d] Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint
>
>
>
> > 	Now I want the version with the IR control back
>
> Do most people, like me, have conventional aerial co-ax from node 0
> to most (all?) rooms in the house, and place their TiVO's, sat
> decoders etc at node 0? IR superimposed on co-ax makes more sense to
> me than IR over cat5 since it saves wire and sitting an IR reciever
> on top of the telly is the natural place for it.
>
> I guess a hybrid system would be perfect...
>
> Patrick
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
> MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
> http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>




Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/