The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint


  • To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint
  • From: "Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:10:11 +0100
  • Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
  • Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

If the idea I am working on succeeds then you wont need a second run of
CAT5. you will be able to upgrade the existing KAT5 units to handle the IR
as well.

First tests look really promising.

Keith

-----Original Message-----
From: Mark Harrison [mailto:Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 05 June 2001 15:20
To: 'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'
Subject: RE: [ukha_d] Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint


I don't have co-ax.

However, I could live with a second run of CAT5 if I needed to...

Mark Harrison
Head of Systems, eKingfisher

****************************************************************************
Kingfisher plc
Registered Office: North West House, 119 Marylebone Road, London NW1 5PX
Registered in England, Number 1664812

This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and
may contain confidential information.  Unless stated to the contrary, any
opinions or comments are personal to the writer and do not represent the
official view of the company.  If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify us immediately by reply e-mail and then delete this message
from your system.  Please do not copy it or use it for any purposes, or
disclose its contents to any other person.  Thank you for your
co-operation.
****************************************************************************



-----Original Message-----
From: patrickl@xxxxxxx [mailto:patrickl@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 5 June 2001 14:03
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint



> 	Now I want the version with the IR control back

Do most people, like me, have conventional aerial co-ax from node 0
to most (all?) rooms in the house, and place their TiVO's, sat
decoders etc at node 0? IR superimposed on co-ax makes more sense to
me than IR over cat5 since it saves wire and sitting an IR reciever
on top of the telly is the natural place for it.

I guess a hybrid system would be perfect...

Patrick





Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/



_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by the
MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further information visit
http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp



Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/






Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/




Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.