[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint
- From: "Keith Doxey" <ukha@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 21:08:02 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Dont know, but several companies now make multiway distribution amps
specifically designed to work with IR distribution, primarily the SKY TV
Link.
Keith
-----Original Message-----
From: matthew@xxxxxxx [mailto:matthew@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 05 June 2001 20:08
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: [ukha_d] Re: KAT5 - an alternative viewpoint
Would IR via coax work through the LetsAutomate loft box?
--- In ukha_d@y..., "Mark McCall" <mark@a...> wrote:
> > Do most people, like me, have conventional aerial co-ax from node
0
> > to most (all?) rooms in the house, and place their TiVO's, sat
> > decoders etc at node 0? IR superimposed on co-ax makes more sense
to
> > me than IR over cat5 since it saves wire and sitting an IR
reciever
> > on top of the telly is the natural place for it.
>
> IR over coax is excellent.
>
> THe disadvantage is the number of bypass kits you need if you go
through
> distribution amps.
>
> M.
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|