|
The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024
|
Latest message you have seen: RE: CCTV |
[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: OT: Mobile Phone Masts
- To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: OT: Mobile Phone Masts
- From: Mark Harrison <Mark.Harrison@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 13:11:55 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
That's
nothing t do with the emissions.
The problem that
the
Petroleum Regulations is dealing with is t do with handset batteries. If,
as
always seems t be the case with my phone, the battery is slightly loose,
then
there is the potential for a spark.
Sparks + petrol fumes =
explosions.
Now, t be fair, this has
never
happened on a European forecourt, but
that
was the thinking.
Mark Harrison Head of Systems, eKingfisher
You cant use mobiles on garage forecourt &
hospitals. Where do they put the transmitters ?
Inside forecourt totem poles & on hospital
roofs
Steve.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 12:03
PM
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] OT: Mobile Phone
Masts
This always gets me: it's a
physics fundamental isn't it? Radiated field strength is inversely
proportional t distance from emmiter..
The power going each way in
a
mobile phone call must be about the same. Sure the base station has much
bigger antennae but still, they can't be pumping out more than five or
six times what a handset does...
And yet people think the masts are
a
terrible health risk, but clamp a phone flat a against the side of their
head.....
I can see a pile of transmitters a few hundred metres away
on the hilltop. They bother me a lot less than the handset itself
does!
or have I, again, got my physics all
skewwiff?
Ian.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael
Mc Aree" <michael.mcaree@xxxxxxx> To:
<ukha_d@xxxxxxx> Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2001 11:51
AM Subject: [ukha_d] OT: Mobile Phone Masts
> You techy
people may know, buy why can't they put masts on top of > Electricity
Pylons? Benefits are that they can be quite high and can have no >
complaints from the fools who live under them, as opposed t on the
roof of > a two story building with the local community going nuts
about it! > > Michael > BELFAST > > >
############################################### > This e-mail, and
any
attachment, is confidential. If you have received > it in error,
please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose > the
information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of >
this message may contain personal views which are not the views of
the > company, unless specifically stated. >
################################################# > > > >
____________________________________ > Automated Home UK > http://www.automatedhome.co.uk >
____________________________________ > > Your use of Yahoo!
Groups is subject t http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/ > >
____________________________________ Automated
Home UK http://www.automatedhome.co.uk ____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
____________________________________ Automated
Home UK http://www.automatedhome.co.uk ____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
_____________________________________________________________________ This
message has been checked for all known viruses by the MessageLabs Virus
Scanning Service. For further information visit http://www.messagelabs.com/stats.asp
____________________________________
Automated Home UK
http://www.automatedhome.co.uk
____________________________________
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject t the Yahoo! Terms of Service.
|
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|
|