[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: ADSL vs Cable Modem
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: ADSL vs Cable Modem
- From: "Phil Harris" <phillip.harris1@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:26:35 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
C&W's networks are - almost without exception - unsuitable for digital
services...
...a friend of mine is on the NTL digital services development team and the
only way they've been able to get digital services running in those areas
is
to rip out the old cables and lay new!
Phil
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Greenwood [mailto:martin@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 12 April 2001 16:12
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] ADSL vs Cable Modem
>
>
> Kevin
>
> It is very hard to get both ADSL + Cable in the same area, so maybe
> no-one has used both, so maybe this is why no comparative replies!!
>
> My brother pays £20 per month in Camberley for NTL Cable. It works ok
> and is fast, but every few weeks the service goes down for a few
> hours.
> Because he needs access all day, he keeps his normal modem,
> so it's not ideal!!
>
> I cannot get Cable in London SE10 as NTL have inherited the old Cable
> & Wireless cables which are supposed to be unsuitable?!
>
> Martin
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-~>
> Teach your child to read with Hooked on Phonics!
> Hooked on Phonics is easy for parents, fun for
> children and highly recommeded by educators.
> Discover why over 2 million families have purchased
> Hooked on Phonics to help their children succeed.
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/oPDEUD/mfYCAA/OZ8EAA/IUJVlB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------_->
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|