[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: ADSL vs Cable Modem
- To: <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: ADSL vs Cable Modem
- From: "Michael Mc Aree" <michael.mcaree@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:15:26 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
I've had NTL 64k for about a week now and it does me fine. I am the only
one
who looks at the homeseer server running on it and I do very little surfing
at home. My Father has the 512 service and it rocks! the speed is excellent
but you get what you pay for.
Michael
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Martin Greenwood [mailto:martin@xxxxxxx]
> Sent: 12 April 2001 16:12
> To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [ukha_d] ADSL vs Cable Modem
>
>
> Kevin
>
> It is very hard to get both ADSL + Cable in the same area, so maybe
> no-one has used both, so maybe this is why no comparative replies!!
>
> My brother pays £20 per month in Camberley for NTL Cable. It works ok
> and is fast, but every few weeks the service goes down for a few
> hours.
> Because he needs access all day, he keeps his normal modem, so
> it's not ideal!!
>
> I cannot get Cable in London SE10 as NTL have inherited the old Cable
> & Wireless cables which are supposed to be unsuitable?!
>
> Martin
>
>
>
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
###############################################
This e-mail, and any attachment, is confidential. If you have received
it in error, please delete it from your system, do not use or disclose
the information in any way, and notify me immediately. The contents of
this message may contain personal views which are not the views of the
company, unless specifically stated.
#################################################
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|