[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: ADSL vs Cable Modem
- To: "'ukha_d@xxxxxxx'" <ukha_d@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: ADSL vs Cable Modem
- From: "Brown, Andy [Infrastructure]" <andyb@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2001 16:38:34 +0100
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Small world! I'm in SE10, but I have BT Openwoe.
-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Greenwood [mailto:martin@xxxxxxx]
Sent: 12 April 2001 16:12
To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [ukha_d] ADSL vs Cable Modem
Kevin
It is very hard to get both ADSL + Cable in the same area, so maybe=20
no-one has used both, so maybe this is why no comparative replies!!
My brother pays =A320 per month in Camberley for NTL Cable. It works ok=20
and is fast, but every few weeks the service goes down for a few=20
hours.
Because he needs access all day, he keeps his normal modem, so it's not
ideal!!
I cannot get Cable in London SE10 as NTL have inherited the old Cable=20
& Wireless cables which are supposed to be unsuitable?!
Martin
=20
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/=20
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|