[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
RE: RG6 vs CT100
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: RE: RG6 vs CT100
- From: nigel@xxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 01 Dec 2000 19:23:01 -0000 (GMT)
- Delivered-to: rich@xxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: mailing list ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: list ukha_d@xxxxxxx; contact
ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
On 01-Dec-2000 Phil Harris wrote:
> Are they seriously saying signals only flow one way down CT100? Are
> they
> saying that they didn't have two-way comms with your old analogue
> boxes?
Just another point of view- although the bidirectional thing could be
rubbish (it probably is, but it is possible that the uplink is
marginal in some spec of the cable which one co-ax might meet and
another fail on**), do they have to fit connectors to it? Co-ax
connectors are specific to cable size, so if they carry crimps for
RG6 they could well not work reliably on CT100.
I don't know the spec of either cable well, so it's possible that
neither of these are the reason, but don't dismiss it entirely yet!
Nigel
** While _wire_ is bidirectional, the line drivers in the box in
your
house are probably designed for low price, not specifically for their
ability to drive a range of different cables...
-------------------------- eGroups Sponsor -------------------------~-~>
eGroups eLerts
It's Easy. It's Fun. Best of All, it's Free!
http://click.egroups.com/1/9698/1/_/2065/_/975775640/
---------------------------------------------------------------------_->
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|