The UK Home Automation Archive

Archive Home
Group Home
Search Archive


Advanced Search

The UKHA-ARCHIVE IS CEASING OPERATIONS 31 DEC 2024


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: 2 questions...


  • To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Subject: Re: 2 questions...
  • From: Nigel Orr <nigel.orr@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:39:52 +0100
  • Delivered-to: listsaver-egroups-ukha_d@xxxxxxx
  • Mailing-list: contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
  • Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx

At 15:05 12/08/99 +0100, you wrote:
>The distances involved in a house shouldnt cause overhearing to any
>significant degree even if you do use split pairs.

Even of the ringing signal?  That's good, as I have a couple of places
where I need a separate phone connection each side of a wall, and one run
would be preferable.

How much crosstalk would you expect on cat-5 at audio frequencies- I've not
seen any figures, and some real figures in dB would be useful for, say, a
20m run.

Presumably (though I haven't thought about this alot) lines emanating from
a home PABX might be higher impedance on the audio than from a _real_ BT
exchange, so less immune to the ring signal, which might be at a lower
impedance?  Any mileage in that theory?  (well it was the best I could come
up with at short notice)

Nigel

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click here for 4 FREE TRIAL ISSUES of Sports Illustrated!  If you're
satisfied, your subscription will continue at the guaranteed lowest rate
of $.75 an issue for 52 issues! http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/678


eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/ukha_d
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying
group communications






Home | Main Index | Thread Index

Comments to the Webmaster are always welcomed, please use this contact form . Note that as this site is a mailing list archive, the Webmaster has no control over the contents of the messages. Comments about message content should be directed to the relevant mailing list.