[Date Prev][Date
Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date
Index][Thread Index]
Re: 2 questions...
- To: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: 2 questions...
- From: Nigel Orr <nigel.orr@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 15:39:52 +0100
- Delivered-to: listsaver-egroups-ukha_d@xxxxxxx
- Mailing-list: contact ukha_d-owner@xxxxxxx
- Reply-to: ukha_d@xxxxxxx
At 15:05 12/08/99 +0100, you wrote:
>The distances involved in a house shouldnt cause overhearing to any
>significant degree even if you do use split pairs.
Even of the ringing signal? That's good, as I have a couple of places
where I need a separate phone connection each side of a wall, and one run
would be preferable.
How much crosstalk would you expect on cat-5 at audio frequencies- I've not
seen any figures, and some real figures in dB would be useful for, say, a
20m run.
Presumably (though I haven't thought about this alot) lines emanating from
a home PABX might be higher impedance on the audio than from a _real_ BT
exchange, so less immune to the ring signal, which might be at a lower
impedance? Any mileage in that theory? (well it was the best I could come
up with at short notice)
Nigel
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Click here for 4 FREE TRIAL ISSUES of Sports Illustrated! If you're
satisfied, your subscription will continue at the guaranteed lowest rate
of $.75 an issue for 52 issues! http://clickhere.egroups.com/click/678
eGroups.com home: http://www.egroups.com/group/ukha_d
http://www.egroups.com - Simplifying
group communications
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index
|