[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: X10 PC Interface upgrade

Subject: Re: X10 PC Interface upgrade
From: Rich Wonneberger <Turtil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010 22:53:32 -0400
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <hti4jt$nrg$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <htj4eh$gij$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <htjqeq$s7k$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <htjuto$5he$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <htkcco$rbk$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <htkhhb$30b$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <htq4a5$fkj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <htr48g$t6p$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <htuaj5$9h2$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <htul0l$p0c$3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <htutes$5ih$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <hu0bki$ucj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <DA_Mn.129905$0M5.63804@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <hu3l45$cl3$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <hu44sk$6dj$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Dabbler,

So if Art went from a CP290 to the 1132 and the CM11 succeeded the CP290
there may be a chance the 1132 can replace the CM11?

TIA
Rich W.


Dabbler wrote:
> "Art Todesco" <actodesco@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> I'm not sure I understand the question. And, I'll have to answer no,
>> because I know little about the CM11.  Doesn't the CM111 require the
>> computer to do all the work, i.e. is it just an interface, right?
>
>    CM11 was an early successor to CP290 which you could program from a
> PC Windows program through serial connection but could run it off the PC
> with those stored instructions in the CM11.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: X10 PC Interface upgrade
  - From: Dabbler

References:
- Re: X10 PC Interface upgrade
  - From: Rich Wonneberger
- Re: X10 PC Interface upgrade
  - From: Art Todesco
- Re: X10 PC Interface upgrade
  - From: Dabbler

Prev by Message: Re: X10 PC Interface upgrade
Next by Message: Re: X10 PC Interface upgrade
Previous by thread: Re: X10 PC Interface upgrade
Next by thread: Re: X10 PC Interface upgrade
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home