Re: Long Live the Incandescent!

["Bill Kearney" <wkearney99@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

"Marc_F_Hult" <MFHult@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:2r3f55ln06csh49o70ea44r0nuii4tfm27@xxxxxxxxxx
> Using Dave's broken logic, there is nothing worth doing because any given
> use
> which in turn is only a fraction of the total usage within any of four
> major
> energy sectors. There are very roughly 16 use-sector subdivisions so  each
> accounting for ~~6%  -- EACH ONE OF WHICH  needs to be reduced for global
> efforts to be successful.

Thank you Marc for making that point.  It's not a matter of which ONE is the
solution.   Every little bit counts.  There is the matter of 'total'
consumption cost.  But I'm pained to read the endless rants from idiots
decrying ANY new movement because they've managed to brew up some numbers
that make it look bad.  The status quo is obviously not working so some
movement is going to be necessary.  I accept that this will take multiple
efforts on many different fronts.  Thankfully there are more choices,
naysayers be damned.