[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: new z-wave gateway

Subject: Re: new z-wave gateway
From: "BruceR" <razrbruce@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 10:26:58 -1000
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <VKqdnfDqTZN91RfanZ2dnUVZ_jSdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <EtadnaBQH-nxBxfanZ2dnUVZ_gednZ2d@xxxxxxx> <recjfmntpye7$.dosmcrku4qxu$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx>

 Ryan White wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 17:59:26 -0500, Robert Green wrote:
snipAbout the only thing I'm sure of is that it won't be X-10.
>
> Why not have all this different shit being responsive to, and driven
> by, your home-based server system via IP?

One "standard" for me is that the HA controller be a non-PC, standalone
device. PC's don't behave well on recovery from power failures and have
a tendency to reboot by themselves. The standalone boxes, such as
Stargate, can remain in service for years without a reboot or downtime.

References:
- new z-wave gateway
  - From: Bill Kearney
- Re: new z-wave gateway
  - From: Robert Green
- Re: new z-wave gateway
  - From: Ryan White

Prev by Message: Re: Adding a an on/off switch to appliance that doesnt have one
Next by Message: Re: new z-wave gateway
Previous by thread: Re: new z-wave gateway
Next by thread: Re: new z-wave gateway
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home