[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: garage remote jamming

Subject: Re: garage remote jamming
From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney-99@hot-mail-com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 22:53:50 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <45e436ff.577551531@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <slrneu9she.2ck.njc@xxxxxxxxxxx> <45e56b79.656520859@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <dZudnUaUzvLjDXjYnZ2dnUVZ_veinZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <F4idnXHJpcq7WHjYnZ2dnUVZ_o_inZ2d@xxxxxxx> <45e5d3ff.683278937@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <7qednRddSqih1nrYnZ2dnUVZ_tSunZ2d@xxxxxxx>

> I think a careful read of that says....

More like 'in a desperate attempt to find a way to spin FUD...'  Give it a
rest.

> Maybe someone else can ask Lutron directly since I've about exhausted my
> interest in this subject unless someone can prove *ANY* home-based RF
> solution can operate in the presence of a much stronger transmitter
> operating on the same frequency.

I've no idea why you're attempting to stretch the argument to such a
ridiculous extreme.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: garage remote jamming
  - From: Robert Green

References:
- Re: garage remote jamming
  - From: Robert Green

Prev by Message: Re: garage remote jamming
Next by Message: Re: CAT5 568A v. 568B..Hmmm..odd problem?
Previous by thread: Re: garage remote jamming
Next by thread: Re: garage remote jamming
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home