Re: Finishing basement, suggestion on RG6 cable needed

["G-squared" <stratus46@xxxxxxxxx>]

BIOSMonkey wrote:
> So I'm finishing my basement, and am running all the data/com lines.  Obviously
> I want the best cable I can afford for future-proofing (if there is such a
> thing).
>
> I can't decide between a single RG6 for everything (satellite and cable TV), or
> one high-end for satellite and a cheaper one for cable.  I thought it would be
> best to use one for everything, but due to cost I am not sure if high-end low
> loss digital cable would be overkill for CATV (I should note though that I do
> have broadband cable modem).
>
> For the all-in-one cable, I am looking at Belden 7916A, which is quad shield RG6
> sweep tested to 3Ghz.  I am not sure if I really need quad, but thought it might
> be best for the CATV runs.
>
> Or, I could get Belden 1694A (low loss RG6 swept to 3Gz, non-quad) for satellite
> and a cheaper RG6 for cable.
>
> Or, just get the 1694A for everything.
>
> Recommendations?
>
> PS- recommendations for network cable welcome too (looking at Commscope
> ultramedia)

I use 1694 for my 1 short run for OTA antenna. The nominal attenuation
is slightly less than 7916 though the shielding isn't quite as good and
while I haven't checked the price difference, I bet it is substantial.
Many post houses in LA use 1694 for HD serial digital runs because it's
really good. Unless you're in a REALLY difficult interference location,
I think you'll find 1694 to work well.

GG