[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: is x10.com dead?

Subject: Re: is x10.com dead?
From: "Bill Kearney" <wkearney99@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 16:33:34 -0500
Newsgroups: comp.home.automation
References: <we6dnUszuNJ8n2nenZ2dnUVZ_sKdnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <50cb70803b6108c800b16f1eca98@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <rdydna6HkY5u42neRVn-gA@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1140193033.724565.160660@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

> Is it perfect, no.  I have had the challenges
> of learning it's limitations and complexities

There's the rub.  A light switch shouldn't require that.  Solutions from
other companies not using X-10's crappy signally likewise don't require
that.  To have to walk on eggshells just to plug in devices because of
X-10's design defects is crazy.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: is x10.com dead?
  - From: Robert Green

References:
- Re: is x10.com dead?
  - From: Bill Kearney
- Re: is x10.com dead?
  - From: Byron Hynes
- Re: is x10.com dead?
  - From: Bill Kearney
- Re: is x10.com dead?
  - From: jajohn80

Prev by Message: Re: Best format to post schematics?
Next by Message: Re: roZetta protocols
Previous by thread: Re: is x10.com dead?
Next by thread: Re: is x10.com dead?
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

comp.home.automation Main Index | comp.home.automation Thread Index | comp.home.automation Home | Archives Home