Re: Insteon question

[The Alien <Someone@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

X-No-archive: yes
On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 11:19:04 GMT, nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dave Houston)
used recycled pixels to say:

>I'm not much impressed by press releases. I prefer hands on technical stuff.
>
>"jcm" <justincmass@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>Dave,
>>
>>Thought you'd find this info interesting (re: Smarthome) -
>>
>>First Alert Home Safety Products to Incorporate Smarthome's INSTEON
>>Technology
>>http://www.insteon.net/pdf/PR20051108a.pdf
>>
>>Smarthome's INSTEON Home Control Networking Technology Embraced by
>>Somfy
>>http://www.insteon.net/pdf/PR20051108b.pdf
>>
>>INSTEON Alliance Reports Over 40 New Third Party INSTEON-Enabled
>>Products in
>>Active Development
>>http://www.insteon.net/pdf/PR20051108c.pdf
>>
>>Smarthome INSTEON Alliance Passes 300-Member Mark
>>http://www.insteon.net/pdf/PressRelease20051101.pdf
>>
>>
>>
>>Dave Houston wrote:
>>> I didn't think to try this when I was testing the Insteon starter kit.
>>>
>>> Page 35 of the Insteon whitepaper (released after I returned the starter kit
>>> to Martin Custer at AutomatedOutlet.com) implies that Insteon receivers can
>>> 'hear' an Insteon signal even if there is an X-10 signal present at the same
>>> time.
>>>
>>> If anyone has Insteon, a TM751 & an HR12A they can test this by holding down
>>> a Dim or Bright button on the HR12A while sending an Insteon command.


To quote Mark Twain:
"There are three kinds of lies, lies, damned lies and statistics"
"Statistics" should also include sales .PDF's!


------------------------------------------------
Autobot This Spammers!
<A HREF="mailto:postmaster@[127.0.0.1]";></A>
mailto:postmaster@xxxxxxxxx
(to reply to actual address, dispense the dots before
and after sirname.