Re: Seeking The Best DIY Alarm Consultant

["BruceR" <brNOSPAM@xxxxxxxxxx>]

...And all of you at ASA disrupt all of us at CHA who don't give a crap
about your little flame wars. Would you guys please stop copying CHA on
this stuff?  Have all the fun amongst yourselves at ASA - just leave CHA
out of it - PLEASE!

From:Jim
alarminex@xxxxxxx

> Frank Olson wrote:
>> "Group Moderator" <GroupModerator@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:ne_de.26705$RP1.17073@xxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>> Mike Said:
>>> Like you always say " Don't have to be an alarm tech to own an alarm
>>> company.
>>
>> Check.  I guess that means you can also be a "retired armed alarm
>> response supervisor/operator", or in your case one that started an
>> alarm company while he was employed with another.  That's not the
>> "smartest thing" to do. By golly, I think it may even violate the
>> employment agreement you signed with ADT.  Did they "can your sorry
>> ass" because they found out??
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Where is your online store Frankie Boy?
>>> oops! It is right HERE: http://load.pquinn.com/binaries/fries/
>>
>> Uh-huh...  Only thing is we ran out of "apple pies", but don't
>> worry. There are more on the way.
>>
>>
>>>
>>> I see that you totally forgot 1 small a that you preached about for
>>> years.
>>
>> Ummm...  Let's see...  What would "1 small a" have to do with
>> pointing out the truth about someone who :
>>
>> 1.  posts vitriole about anyone that doesn't agree
>>      with his point of view,
>> 2.  maintains about a dozen websites (most of which
>>      are registered and hosted by a company that
>>      specializes in maintaining your complete privacy),
>> 3.  uses other companies and legitimate organizations
>>      to hide behind (the American Sailing Association
>>      is a recent example you used as an email "handle"),
>> 4.  steals trademarked property and logos to use on
>>      his websites,
>> 5.  munges other peoples tag lines,
>> 6.  posts the addresses, phone numbers, and other
>>      personal information of family and friends of the
>>      people you don't like (most of whom have
>>      probably never even heard of you,
>> 7.  Uses the phony "Group Moderator" tagline and
>>      what's even funnier, posts all this garbage and then
>>      includes a link to his online store figuring people
>>      are going to buy from him after they see what kind of
>>      character you really are,
>> 8.  edits the content of information you copy from Google
>>      and then brags that everything on your site is
>>      "verifiable"...
>>
>> I could go on, but I'm tired after dealing with another emergency
>> call. Some idiot in a Ford service van drove into a parkade that was
>> just a wee bit too low for his ladder rack and took out four
>> sprinkler heads. Fire alarm went off, water everywhere...  It was a
>> mess.  I do have one happy sprinkler fitter though.  He got "tons"
>> of over-time tonight.
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Where is this new SUPER web site that you were making to replace
>>> alt-security-alarms that went absolutely NO WHERE.
>>
>> Been too busy...
>>
>>
>>>
>>> PS: with your track record here I don't think **ANY ONE** cares
>>> about you or what you suggest.
>>
>> And I'm sure you have the "ear" of everyone here.  Posting a persons
>> divorce information and saying it proves they didn't pay their legal
>> bill is pretty low.  Taking another company's property and
>> trademarked logo for use on your websites....  That's theft.  I do
>> feel sorry for the individuals and companies that have lent their
>> names to this *latest* sorry effort of yours (AlarmAssociates.com).
>> Jim Rojas in particular.  He's a decent guy and he's liable to take
>> some "heat" over this too.
>>
>> I'll come right out and say it.  You're a liar, a thief, and a moron
>> (and it's all provable by your own "poison keyboard").  But don't
>> let that stop you, Mike.  We all admire a "moron with a mission".
>> I'm sure people will just flock to your store when they read this.
>> Better put a call through to ADI and prepare them for the flood of
>> orders you'll receive.
>
>
>
> Frank, with regard to your new endeavor with Bass, of "No flaming,
> even if you get flamed".  Is it as apparent to you as it is to
> everyone else, that you actions seem to only be directed at one
> person? One might say that your above post is likely prejudiced by
> the fact that you simply don't like Mike. Don't the same conditions
> exist between you and Bass? Bass disrupts the group. Mike disrupts
> the group. You treat Bass with composure and selfcontrol, but not
> Mike? If you look at that list above, Bass is guilty of just about
> every item on it,if not all, AND ......... more to boot. So what's
> the difference here? Bass is also a proven liar and thief and a moron
> ..... but he gets the soft treatment from you and Mike doesn't?
>
> And come to think of it, are there any reasons that one should
> question you about your qualifications for making the above comments?
> Aren't you doing the very same thing that you accuse Mike of, by
> taking information from past posts and presuming they're true? You
> nor I nor anyone here has the faintest idea how Mike came into his
> business except by the fabrications that Bass is renowned for making.
> You presume to "know" and state as fact, that which has only been
> posted here? My, my, looks to me you're becoming exactly what you are
> accusing others of being.
>
> In other words Frank ........if, in spite of the fact that Bass is the
> instigator of the tribulations in this group ..... in spite of the
> fact that you are just as guilty of disrupting this group as anyone
> else, (and that includes me also) ................. you would give
> Bass the benefit of your antiflame "show", but not anyone else?
>
> Me thinks you've lost sight of something.
>
> Regardless whether your newly aquired epiphanic goal is to:
> [a]..simply to provide your own inner peace
> [b]..an attempt to quell the din here ..........
> [c]..whatever
>
> That's all nice and smoochy but.......... it would seem to me it
> should be applied evenly.