Re: MONA T. RONICS

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Saturday, April 29, 2017 at 9:06:00 AM UTC-5, RTS wrote:
> On 4/29/2017 2:12 AM, mleuck wrote:
> > On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 5:29:54 PM UTC-5, Jim Davis wrote:
> >> On Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 4:44:43 PM UTC-4, ED wrote:
> >>> Just curious of what other installers think of the above monitoring/d=
ealership company that sells systems to consumers who are not told that the=
 mainboard of the security system that they have purchased, cannot be taken=
 over by another company for monitoring. And this is done in collusion and =
collaboration of companies such as Honeywell.
> >>
> >> Nowdays ..... any alarm system that uses 4/2 format or CID to a phone =
line can be taken over.
> >
> > Only an idiot still uses 4/2 format
> >
>=20
> Not to put to fine a point on the "name" calling,
>=20
> Not every place in America or the world has the quality of phone service=
=20
> that will allow acceptable CID to function.
> A.T.T. is one of the biggest offenders in our region for this failing..
> (floating impedance) (floating voltage) (cross voltage in multi pairs)
>=20
> Now if you know of a way to CID using pulse voltage I'd be happy to give=
=20
> it a try..
>=20
> RTS

In those cases you'd ditch the phone line and install a cell