Re: MONA T. RONICS

[RTS <gafa@xxxxxxx>]

On 4/29/2017 2:12 AM, mleuck wrote:
> On Friday, April 28, 2017 at 5:29:54 PM UTC-5, Jim Davis wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 27, 2017 at 4:44:43 PM UTC-4, ED wrote:
>>> Just curious of what other installers think of the above monitoring/dealership company that sells systems to consumers who are not told that the mainboard of the security system that they have purchased, cannot be taken over by another company for monitoring. And this is done in collusion and collaboration of companies such as Honeywell.
>>
>> Nowdays ..... any alarm system that uses 4/2 format or CID to a phone line can be taken over.
>
> Only an idiot still uses 4/2 format
>

Not to put to fine a point on the "name" calling,

Not every place in America or the world has the quality of phone service
that will allow acceptable CID to function.
A.T.T. is one of the biggest offenders in our region for this failing..
(floating impedance) (floating voltage) (cross voltage in multi pairs)

Now if you know of a way to CID using pulse voltage I'd be happy to give
it a try..

RTS