[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Nick, I just don't get it!



On Sep 26, 2:17=A0pm, "Bob La Londe" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> "nick markowitz" <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>
> news:aca30241-8359-4dc1-a4cb-699beef45a20@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Sep 25, 8:58 pm, Frank Kurz <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>http://www.firetechs.net/Burning_Brick_Awards/FairlaneFire/Fairlane_F..=
.
>
> >> --
> >> Frank Kurzwww.firetechs.net
>
> > Reminds me of the factory I have where they just tagged all the fire
> > extinguishers as in good working order despite fact they where ready
> > to rust thru and loose there contents. Too many brick heads who just
> > do not care.When we called company they said that's what there
> > customers want .Well not this customer its full of blended oils so
> > needless to say
> > they no longer service it.
>
> > This is what happens when the industry hires the lowest common
> > denominator for service techs and installers =A0they can find and then
> > has customer sign exculpatory agreements. which prevents them being
> > sued.
>
> In most states (to my knowledge) exculpatory agreements do not protect
> against liability for gross negligence.

The problem is being able to prove it to the satisfaction of the court
and all too many times things get thrown out or not proven even thou
you would think it was gross negligence. you have to be able to prove
the intent.


alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home