[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Honeywell and 2gig settle

Subject: Re: Honeywell and 2gig settle
From: mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2011 21:21:30 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <dc74ffb3-44eb-4829-ae20-ba3226bf27b2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <2359b901-777c-4863-a461-2678564c9ba4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Jun 4, 8:35=A0pm, Jim <alarmi...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Jun 4, 9:09=A0pm, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> >http://www.securitysystemsnews.com/article/honeywell-and-2gig-settle-...
>
> > We talked about this couple months back seems they settled
>
> Which means they either paid for using Honeywell's ideas or someone
> didn't do their homework.

Or it could be the founders were a Honeywell salesman and AlarmNet
executive, sometimes companies don't like former employees as
competitors

References:
- Honeywell and 2gig settle
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: Honeywell and 2gig settle
  - From: Jim

Prev by Message: Re: IP network CCTV
Next by Message: Re: IP network CCTV
Previous by thread: Re: Honeywell and 2gig settle
Next by thread: Re: Honeywell and 2gig settle
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home