Re: 2Gig/ Alarm.com / Vivint (APX)

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Aug 20, 7:49=C2=A0am, proguard <sp.kintzoni...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 20 =CE=91=CF=8D=CE=B3, 09:23, G. Morgan <G_Mor...@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > proguard Wrote:
>
> > >On 19 ???, 22:02, mleuck <m.le...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >> On Aug 19, 2:45=C2=A0am, Spellcheck Patrol <alarminst...@xxxxxxx> wr=
ote:
>
> > >> > So if you found these flaws tomorrow would you implore Monkey to s=
top
> > >> > pushing that service or would you just stay hushed because of the =
rash
> > >> > of cut backs and layoffs?
>
> > >> Again Tom I don't work that way and there is no rash of cut backs an=
d
> > >> layoffs
>
> > >Ok, and if i jam GSM and cut phone lines before the break in from
> > >entry zone, how this thing copmmunicate with the ARC?
>
> > How is *any* system going to communicate in that scenario?
>
> Yes but "any" other panel and ARC dont advertise "smash & crash"
> By the way they are alternatve ways to communicate by UHF frequencies
> directly or remotely to a communicator located in other site with the
> phone line and gsm there nd remotely communicate but it is simplex and
> costs.

Any other panel and ARC couldn't advertise smash and crash because
it's patented by Alarm.com