Re: SIA standards

[mleuck <m.leuck@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Apr 7, 3:09=A0pm, halama_at_jablocom_dot_...@xxxxxxx (jan.halama)
wrote:
> responding tohttp://www.secure-gear.com/security-physical/SIA-standards-5=
9218-.htm
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> jan.halama wrote:
> SRyckman wrote:
> > On Apr 6, 9:40=3DA0am, halama_at_jablocom_dot_...@xxxxxxx (jan.halama)
> > wrote:
> >> =A01. Is SIA DC-09 Internet protocol event reporting protocol
> >> wide-spread i=3D
> > n
> >> the security systems and supported by receivers?
> > No. =A0Several manufacturers have said they have it implemented but it'=
s
> > use is very low at best. =A0Most manufacturers use their proprietary
> > protocols as the default in their equipment.
> >> > 2. Is there any standard for video verification? DC-04 DSC
> >>> 2000?
> > DC-04 (DCS SIA 2000 Standard) - commonly called SIA 2000 also has very
> > little adoption. =A0 I'm not aware of any mainstream panels that suppor=
t
> > it and most receivers do not either. =A0 This standard was created for
> > future expansion and most vendors have not seen the need for it yet.
>
> -------------------------------------
>
> Thank you for your answers. I am interested in IP communication to CMS.
> You say
> that new SIA protocols are not supported. How does it work in the CMS
> world if
> every manufacturer has own proprietary protocol. Is it neccesary to have
> special
> receiver for every type of control panel which is connected?

Every manufacturer uses a different method of IP communication from
the panel and at the central station