[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Shoe on the other foot for a building inspector

Subject: Re: Shoe on the other foot for a building inspector
From: jackcsg <jackcsc@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2010 06:57:49 -0700 (PDT)
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <996258f0-6a03-468c-9c6f-a106b29de446@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <mrQno.1020$u9.519@edtnps82> <7503569d-c9ae-42d9-968e-f8096836040d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Sep 26, 7:49=A0pm, nick markowitz <nmarkow...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sep 26, 7:12=A0pm, Frank Kurz <t...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> > On 26/09/2010 12:42 PM, nick markowitz wrote:
>
> > >http://kdka.com/kdkainvestigators/Builidng.inspector.cited.2.1914812..=
..
>
> > What a maroon!
>
> > --
> > Frank Kurz
> > The Fire Protection Technicians Networkhttp://www.firetechs.net
>
> Got to agree with you there. But it does not surprise me it happened
> in Pittsburgh the story's i could tell you thats why I stay out of the
> city.
> At least ICC has reigned them in.

For every one that gets caught...there's a thousand that don't. I wish
I was special...

References:
- Shoe on the other foot for a building inspector
  - From: nick markowitz
- Re: Shoe on the other foot for a building inspector
  - From: Frank Kurz
- Re: Shoe on the other foot for a building inspector
  - From: nick markowitz

Prev by Message: Re: A Ha as I suspected. UL 864 has addressed battery issue
Next by Message: Re: Shoe on the other foot for a building inspector
Previous by thread: Re: Shoe on the other foot for a building inspector
Next by thread: Re: Shoe on the other foot for a building inspector
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home