Re: Explosion Proof Detection

[Effenpig1 <dirtyspicevent@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Jan 9, 4:14=A0pm, "RockyTSquirrel" <gafa@/nospam/usa.com> wrote:
> they want "Explosion Proof" =A0and their =A0inside a town =A0with "walkin=
g traffic
> on two sides" ?!!
> how in the hell did they get a permit to do that?
>
> I've done the explosion proof stuff for a defense contractor =A0and their
> first thing was to be wayyyyyy =A0far away from people..
> See which =A0codes =A0their =A0using to base their call for that type of =
devices..
> They =A0maybe looking at the wrong specs...
>
> "Bob La Londe" <n...@xxxxxxxx> wrote in messagenews:aJU1n.29572$Gf3.17409=
@newsfe22.iad...
>
> > Ok... =A0what is there that meets a weatherproof and explosion proof
> criteria,
> > and has any chance of detecting in intruders in a fenced yard.
>
> > Yes I said explosion proof.
>
> > I was thinking stacked photo beams for coverage, but I can not find any
> that
> > meet the explosion proof rating. =A0Suggestions? =A0Ideas? =A0Just walk=
 away....
> > I actually quoted them a video system and found explosion proof rated
> > cameras for a reasonable price, but they were not willing to pay what i=
t
> > costs.
>
> > Now they want me to quote them some kind of detection system. =A0Their =
fence
> > is way to loose and out of tune to even consider a microphone cable on =
the
> > fence. =A0Its in town with walking traffic on two sides anyway.

Every gas station has explosion proof fitting and such, and there are
plenty of them inside a town  with "walking traffic on two sides"