[Message Prev][Message Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Message Index][Thread Index]

Re: Explosion Proof Detection

Subject: Re: Explosion Proof Detection
From: "Bob La Londe" <nospam@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 23:17:10 -0700
Newsgroups: alt.security.alarms
References: <aJU1n.29572$Gf3.17409@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <%%U1n.3400$5m.2266@xxxxxxxxxxxx> <hi96ju$oqv$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <W8V1n.3401$5m.282@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

"alarman" <nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:W8V1n.3401$5m.282@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Bob La Londe wrote:
> > Yep.  Still figured I would give it a shot.  If they had not turned
>> down the cost on the video system I would be a little more gungho on
>> the detection stuff.  I can't see how detection would be cheaper...
>> and work.
>
> Why explosion proof, isn't it outside?

Because its an environment with flash potential.  Yes its outside.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Explosion Proof Detection
  - From: alarman

References:
- Explosion Proof Detection
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: Explosion Proof Detection
  - From: alarman
- Re: Explosion Proof Detection
  - From: Bob La Londe
- Re: Explosion Proof Detection
  - From: alarman

Prev by Message: Re: Ping: Petem
Next by Message: Re: Ping: Petem
Previous by thread: Re: Explosion Proof Detection
Next by thread: Re: Explosion Proof Detection
Index(es):
- Message
- Thread

alt.security.alarms Main Index | alt.security.alarms Thread Index | alt.security.alarms Home | Archives Home